Vaccine Injury, Big Pharma, and the Fight for Justice ⚖️🩺

by DickVegas on June 14, 2024 at 9:58 am
Posted In: DV13 Chronicles 📚🕵️‍♂️✨, The Threat of Big PHARM-A 💊⚠️💉, Vaccine Dangers and Risks 💉⚠️🚫, ✨ New Series: DV-13 Chronicles Unveiled! ✨
COVID Virus or Vaccine: Neurocognitive Morbidity in Children 🧠💉

Vaccine Injury, Big Pharma, and the Fight for Justice ⚖️🩺

In a stunning exposé, we dive into the harrowing story of Brianne Dressen, a Utah mother whose life turned upside down after participating in AstraZeneca’s COVID-19 vaccine trial. Once a healthy and vibrant individual, Brianne now battles severe neurological damage, recognized by the NIH as vaccine-induced. Her lawsuit against AstraZeneca highlights the treacherous terrain of the U.S. Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act, which grants almost absolute immunity to vaccine makers like AstraZeneca, Moderna, and Pfizer (TrialSite News).

The PREP Act is designed to shield pharmaceutical giants from liability, but Brianne’s case brings to light the dark underbelly of this legislation. Represented by Aaron Siri of Siri Glimstad LLP, her battle is not just about personal justice but about challenging the very fabric of laws that protect Big Pharma at the expense of individuals. The media, often in cahoots with these corporations, tries to downplay such stories, spinning narratives to protect their interests (KUTV) 📰🔍.

The PREP Act’s Dark Side 🌑⚠️

The PREP Act was meant to encourage rapid vaccine development during pandemics by providing liability protection. However, this shield has been abused, allowing pharmaceutical companies to sidestep accountability even when blatant contract breaches occur (PREP Act Overview). Courts are now beginning to question the extent of these protections, and Brianne’s case might be the catalyst for change. The lawsuit, if successful, could open the floodgates for similar claims, piercing the legislative armor that protects these companies (Aaron Siri Interview) ⚔️.

David vs. Goliath: The Legal Battle 💼⚔️

Brianne’s case could potentially reach the U.S. Supreme Court, setting a precedent for future litigation against Big Pharma (Daniel Aaron Interview). This case is crucial not only for vaccine-injured individuals but for the entire legal framework surrounding vaccine liability. If courts start ruling against the PREP Act’s broad protections, it could lead to more rigorous oversight and accountability for pharmaceutical companies (TrialSite News Report) 🔍.

The Role of React19.org in the Fight 🕊️💡

React19.org, co-founded by Brianne Dressen, stands as a beacon of hope for those injured by COVID-19 vaccines. This non-profit organization offers resources, support, and advocacy for individuals dealing with vaccine-related injuries (React19.org). They provide a comprehensive database of scientific research (Published Science Database) and educational webinars for healthcare providers (Virtual Rounds Webinars) 🏥.

Media Spin and Censorship 🚫🗞️

The mainstream media often spins these stories to protect Big Pharma, subverting information and undermining public awareness. Experimentalvaccines.org has seen its web traffic inexplicably drop despite high engagement on platforms like Twitter. This suggests a form of censorship where links are suppressed to control the narrative (Experimental Vaccines Traffic Report) 📉.

For more information and to support those affected, visit React19.org. Follow them on their social media platforms for updates and ways to get involved:

Written by Dick Vegas, approved by Kenny Valenzuela, ExperimentalVaccines.org.

The Modern Dr. Moreau: Fauci’s Dark Legacy 🌍🧬💉

Here are six mainstream articles about vaccine injury lawsuits against AstraZeneca:

  • “Patients launch legal action against AstraZeneca over its covid-19 vaccine” – This article covers the legal actions taken by patients in the UK against AstraZeneca, highlighting the complications such as stroke and heart failure. The claimants are pursuing legal action under the Consumer Protection Act 1987 and seeking compensation under the government’s Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme. Read more on The BMJ.
  • “Vaccine trial patient files first US lawsuit against AstraZeneca” – This piece details a U.S. trial participant’s lawsuit against AstraZeneca, claiming the company failed to cover medical costs after she suffered severe side effects from the vaccine. Read more on The Telegraph.
  • “AstraZeneca Sued Over Covid-19 Vaccine Clinical Trial Injury” – The article reports on Brianne Dressen’s lawsuit against AstraZeneca, detailing her severe neurological injuries and the company’s failure to fulfill its contractual obligations. Read more on Bloomberg Law.
  • “Covid Vaccine Injury Suit May Fuel Federal Overhaul, Litigation” – This article discusses how lawsuits by COVID-19 vaccine recipients could lead to significant changes in how the federal government handles immunization injuries and compensation. Read more on Bloomberg Law.
  • “Father with brain injury sues pharma giant over Covid vaccine ‘defect’” – It covers Jamie Scott’s High Court claim against AstraZeneca for a brain injury he alleges was caused by the vaccine, describing his condition and the legal battle. Read more on The Independent.
  • “Dad who suffered brain injury days after getting COVID vaccine sues” – This article highlights a similar case where a father claims to have suffered a brain injury from the AstraZeneca vaccine and is now suing the company. Read more on Sky News.

These articles provide a comprehensive view of the ongoing legal battles surrounding vaccine injuries and the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine.

COVID-19 Era Cancers: The ModRNA Vaccine Conspiracy 😱🧬🔍
1 Comment