Dick Vegas Breaks the News:

06/07/24 3:52PM

CDC’s Hidden Truths About the A(H5N1) Outbreak 🕵️‍♂️📢

June 7, 2024 – The CDC just dropped another bombshell update on the avian influenza A(H5N1) virus outbreak that’s spreading across U.S. dairy cows like wildfire. But don’t be fooled by their sanitized, jargon-filled report – there’s more to this story than meets the eye. 🤔

The Outbreak: So far, 83 herds in nine states are confirmed to be infected, with three human cases reported. According to the CDC, all three cases had direct contact with infected cows. But here’s the kicker – they’re still telling us the risk to the general public is low. Really? With this many infected animals? 🐄

The CDC claims that the current A(H5N1) bird flu human health risk assessment for the U.S. general public remains low. But how low is “low”? Considering the virus has already jumped from cows to humans, even sporadically, one has to question the true extent of the threat. Moreover, with the outbreak spreading across multiple states, the potential for it to affect more humans can’t be ignored. Remember the last time they downplayed a viral outbreak? Look where that got us! 😡

Ferret Studies and Genetic Sequences: The CDC’s been busy in the lab, studying the virus from infected humans and animals. They assure us that there are no changes to the virus that would make it more infectious to humans. But partial sequences and incomplete data make one wonder – are they telling us everything? 🧬

Results from the ferret studies conducted by the CDC on the A(H5N1) virus from the human case in Texas were posted on June 7, 2024. They state that no neuraminidase changes were identified that are associated with reduced antiviral susceptibility. The partial hemagglutinin sequence indicates that the virus remains primarily avian. However, this partial data could mean there are aspects of the virus we still don’t understand. Why the incomplete sequences? Is it due to limitations in the research, or is there something more sinister at play? The transparency of these findings is crucial for public trust, yet it seems we’re getting only part of the picture. 🔍

Monitoring and Surveillance: More than 500 people who had exposure to infected animals have been monitored, with 45 tested for flu-like symptoms. The CDC says no unusual flu activity has been found, yet they’re ramping up surveillance and urging farmworkers to take precautions. If the risk is so low, why the high alert? 📈

According to the CDC’s enhanced, nationwide summer surveillance strategy, they are particularly vigilant in areas where A(H5N1) viruses have been detected. They claim this is a precautionary measure, but the increased monitoring and testing of exposed individuals suggest there’s more concern than they’re admitting. With over 500 people monitored and 45 tested, it begs the question: what aren’t they telling us? The disconnect between their reassurances and their actions is glaringly obvious. 🧐

Digital Outreach and Public Health Recommendations: The CDC’s outreach efforts in affected communities are intense, targeting farmworkers with digital ads and local radio spots. They advise avoiding contact with sick animals and their poop – no kidding! But why the sudden push for awareness if everything’s under control? 📲

The digital outreach campaign launched by the CDC aims to raise awareness among farmworkers in affected communities. The first week of English Meta (Facebook and Instagram) placements delivered more than 1 million impressions in affected counties. Spanish language Meta placements launched on June 6, delivering nearly 2,500 impressions within the first hour. With such a massive push for awareness and preventive measures, it’s clear the CDC is preparing for something more serious. If the risk is truly low, why the need for such extensive outreach? 🖥️

The Bigger Picture: The CDC is working closely with the USDA, FDA, and other agencies using a One Health approach. But behind the scenes, there’s a frantic effort to contain this outbreak. The implications for our food supply and public health are massive, yet the full story isn’t being told. 🍽️

This coordinated effort is detailed in the CDC’s One Health approach, emphasizing collaboration between public health, animal health, and environmental health agencies. While the intention is noble, the urgency and scale of their response indicate a potentially severe threat. The stakes are high, not just for the health of our population but also for our food supply. As the number of infected herds grows, so does the risk to the dairy industry and the broader agricultural sector. The economic and health impacts could be far-reaching, yet the CDC’s communication remains cautiously optimistic, if not outright dismissive. 🐄🦠

As we’ve seen before, these health agencies often play down the severity of outbreaks until it’s too late. The A(H5N1) virus is just the latest in a long line of threats that could escalate quickly. Stay vigilant, stay informed, and don’t buy into the official narrative without asking the tough questions. 🛡️🧐

For more on the implications of such health risks and how to protect yourself, check out our article on vaccine exemptions and health safety measures. Stay tuned for more updates as Dick Vegas continues to uncover the truths that others won’t touch. 🌐

Here are six articles that critique the CDC’s response to the A(H5N1) outbreak:

• CDC’s Incomplete Data Raises Concerns: This article highlights how the CDC’s use of partial genetic sequences in their reports leaves gaps in our understanding of the virus’s true threat. The critique focuses on the lack of transparency and potential underestimation of the risk posed by A(H5N1). Read more here [❞].
• Mammal Infections and CDC’s Delayed Response: This piece discusses the spread of A(H5N1) among various mammal species globally, criticizing the CDC for not adequately addressing the broader implications of these infections on public health and animal safety. Read more here [❞].
• Ferret Studies Question CDC’s Assurances: Analyzing the results from ferret studies, this article questions the CDC’s assurances about the virus’s transmissibility and criticizes the incomplete data provided. It argues that the CDC’s conclusions may be premature and not fully reflective of the potential human health risks. Read more here [❞].
• Outbreaks in Marine Mammals Ignored by CDC: This article criticizes the CDC for not giving enough attention to the massive deaths among marine mammals, suggesting that the agency’s focus on terrestrial animals overlooks significant ecological and health implications. Read more here [❞].
• USDA and HHS Criticize CDC’s Coordination Efforts: Highlighting the new actions taken by USDA and HHS to mitigate the spread of H5N1, this article critiques the CDC’s coordination efforts, suggesting that more aggressive and cohesive action is necessary to effectively contain the outbreak. Read more here [❞].
• Expert Opinions on CDC’s Handling of H5N1: Featuring interviews with health experts, this article delves into the criticisms of the CDC’s handling of the H5N1 outbreak, focusing on the perceived slow response and inadequate public communication strategies. Read more here [❞].

These articles provide various perspectives on the CDC’s response to the A(H5N1) outbreak, highlighting concerns about transparency, data completeness, and the overall effectiveness of their strategies.

Update on CDC’s Avian Influenza A(H5N1) “Bird Flu” Response Activities June 7, 2024 🦠📰

• Another Unstoppable Monkey Virus With No Cure Infecting Humans 🐵🔒August 14, 2024
  Unleashing Synthetic Biogenesis: The Final Phase of the Pandemic Agenda In the latest chapter of global health manipulation, reports are surfacing of a “new” virus sweeping through Europe, with no cure in sight. But what they’re not telling you is that this is no natural virus—it’s a product of synthetic biology, lying dormant in those who received the COVID-19 injection. Imagine a world where frequency manipulations can activate biogenetic triggers within […] ↓ Read the rest of this entry…